Kansas City Irish Fest Labor Day Weekend At Crown Center
With over 30 bands on seven stages, heritage workshops and displays,
comedy, genealogy, a massive children's area and so much more, there is
no better way to celebrate Celtic Pride in Cowtown than Kansas City
Irish Fest!
Appeals & Post-Conviction
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Recurring Issues - Installment 2:
Lawyers often ask me, "What issues do you see trial
attorneys missing the most during their trials?" It seems that lately, I am evaluating several
cases which contain many of the same issues repeatedly overlooked by defense
counsel. Last installment, we discussed
the concept of "hearsay" and missed objections to it. In this installment, I offer commentary on
another evidentiary issue arising in trials all over the country:
"Junk science" - Prosecutors, especially in sex
offense cases, are proffering more and more "soft science" as though
it is irrefutable fact. The biggest
examples are "forensic interviewers" and "family
therapists." Prosecutors bring
these people in to testify that these professionals are "experts" who
interviewed the purported victims, and can assure jurors that the purported
victims have exhibited no tell-tale signs of deception. Stated bluntly, these witnesses are being
offered up as human polygraph machines, without credentials recognized by
established universities which offer degrees in widely recognized and
accredited subjects. In other words, the
opinions of these "forensic interviewers" and "family
therapists" are loosely based on subjective and unverified social theory,
which means that the basis underlying these opinions is "junk
science." (The rules pertaining to
the admissibility of opinion testimony are complex. The best way for a defense attorney to oppose
this evidence is to conduct a vigorous cross-examination of the purported
expert, exposing that there are no valid and universally accepted objective
scientific studies backing up the conclusions that they are providing to
jurors. The most effective way to
develop this cross-examination is through preparation before trial of a
thorough and exhaustive outline of specific questions, deriving from basic
scientific principles including "control groups" and "variable
identification/ elimination."
Exposing that the "expert" doesn't know of any studies and/or
how they were conducted can support a later objection wherein the lawyer asks
for the jury to be instructed that the expert's testimony is unsupported and
stricken from the record.)
If you have a family member or friend fighting the battle
against a wrongful conviction, or if you are a lawyer seeking assistance with an
appeal or post-conviction matter, please call this office immediately. There are always time deadlines limiting when
these claims can be raised. If you wish
to learn more about the process, call now.
Jonathan Laurans wants you to be educated as to what you may
be facing. If you or a loved one has
been convicted of a crime in Missouri, Kansas or Texas, or in any federal
court, contact him immediately. Visit
his website at www.kansascitymoattorney.com and then call him at (816) 421-5200
for a FREE initial legal consultation.
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Arts and Crafts Festival 2015
Arts and Crafts Festival 2015
Aug. 21 and 22nd @ 6pm
Arts and Crafts Festival 2015 Screenland Armour's annual celebration of all things beer, music, movies and art!
Aug. 21 and 22nd @ 6pm
Arts and Crafts Festival 2015 Screenland Armour's annual celebration of all things beer, music, movies and art!
Thursday, August 6, 2015
Recurring Issues - Installment 1:
Lawyers often ask me, "What issues do you see trial
attorneys missing the most during their trials?" It seems that lately, I am evaluating several
cases which contain many of the same issues repeatedly overlooked by defense
counsel. In the next few installments, I
will identify some of these:
"Hearsay" - These are statements uttered outside
of the courtroom by someone who is not on the witness stand. They are offered into evidence to prove
something critical to the ongoing trial, i.e., "the statement is being
offered for the truth of the matter asserted." An example would be in a car accident trial,
when a police officer testifies that a bystander on the sidewalk remarked that
the defendant was the one who ran the red light, causing the collision. The bystander's remark, as relayed to the
jury by the officer, is "hearsay" because the bystander is not the
one testifying, and the statement wasn't made in court when it was
uttered. (The rules pertaining to
hearsay are much more complicated and varied.
My only point here is that hearsay statements seem rampant in trial
transcripts I'm evaluating in appellate and post-conviction litigation, and
lawyers are not objecting to them properly.)
If you have a family member or friend fighting the battle
against a wrongful conviction, or if you are a lawyer seeking assistance with
an appeal or post-conviction matter, please call this office immediately. There are always time deadlines limiting when
these claims can be raised. If you wish
to learn more about the process, call now.
Jonathan Laurans wants you to be educated as to what you may
be facing. If you or a loved one has
been convicted of a crime in Missouri, Kansas or Texas, or in any federal
court, contact him immediately. Visit
his website at www.kansascitymoattorney.com and then call him at (816) 421-5200
for a FREE initial legal consultation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)